Verified work evidence

Performance Receipts that tell the truth

A structured, consent-based record of what a person did, what a reviewer checked, and what a customer accepted—including limitations. A Performance Receipt is not a compliance certification, employer sponsorship, or independent third-party accreditation.

Claims hierarchy

We separate self-report, training, simulation, reviewed customer work, and customer acceptance. Those grades are never flattened into one generic “verified” badge.

E0
Declared
Permitted

Self-reported role, skill, or artifact.

Prohibited inflation

“Verified capability” without validation.

E1
Training
Permitted

Course completion or structured instructional participation.

Prohibited inflation

“Performed customer work.”

E2
Simulation
Permitted

Rubric-scored work in a controlled scenario.

Prohibited inflation

“Client-accepted production experience.”

E3
Reviewed project
Permitted

Contributor completed work on an actual customer project; expert review documented.

Prohibited inflation

“Independently certified” if only internally reviewed.

E4
Customer accepted
Permitted

Specific contributions reviewed and customer deliverables accepted, under permitted disclosure.

Prohibited inflation

“Sole project owner” if only one subtask was performed.

Design safeguards

  • • Issue receipts only after documented project completion or an appropriate bounded achievement; distinguish project result from individual contribution.
  • • Require client permission before naming organizations or exposing deliverables; anonymized summaries by default.
  • • Do not transfer customer-owned IP into a public portfolio; evidence may be metadata-only when necessary.
  • • Support correction, revocation, and appeal; verifiers must see revoked or superseded state.
  • • Never publish raw personnel reviews, internal confidence scores, or protected customer files without separately valid grounds.

Interoperability direction

When issuance is mature, MeritSOLV aims to use standards-based verifiable achievement models such as Open Badges 3.0 and CLR 2.0, with competency mapping (including NICE Framework for cybersecurity tasks where applicable). Adherence to a file format does not by itself validate the truth of a performance claim.

PathProof™ may present consented MeritSOLV Performance Receipts under contractual and privacy guardrails—as a separate evidence experience, not a substitute for delivery accountability.

Buyers buy outcomes first

Performance Receipts are a secondary product. Primary value remains fixed-scope, expert-reviewed deliverables for the organization that funded the work.