Solution
AI Vendor & Agent Evaluation
Compare an AI supplier or agent use case against defined business, privacy, security and oversight criteria.
Pilot scopes are subject to qualification, staffing, reviewer availability, and a signed, funded SOW.
Good fit for
CIOs, procurement, legal operations and AI governance sponsors
Included
- • Use-case definition and risk profile
- • Supplier/agent evaluation rubric
- • Evidence-backed capability and control comparison
- • Human-oversight and data-handling requirements
- • Decision briefing with unresolved questions
Not included
- • Production agent implementation or deployment
- • Formal legal, regulatory or privacy opinion
- • Penetration testing or model red teaming
- • Guaranteed safety or compliance of an AI system
What you provide
- • Approved public/vendor documentation and synthetic examples
- • Evaluation goals, constraints and accountable sponsor
- • Supplier responses and information-handling requirements
How we check it
Independent AI governance/security reviewer confirms evidence citations, risk assumptions and limits.
R0-R1. R2 only for approved read-only records
How it runs
We confirm fit, define the scope and acceptance criteria, then send a written SOW and price. Work begins after approval, funding, qualified staffing and an assigned independent reviewer. Deliverables are reviewed before being shared, then accepted or corrected against the SOW.
See every stepWhat this is not
Complements AI Use & Risk Baseline: one evaluates a particular external supplier or agent, the other establishes organizational AI-use governance.
